Rude Son Acts Like He’s Better Than Poor Students, Fed up Mom Comes up With Clever Punishment

rude-son-punished

Parents around the country are applauding a mother from Georgia for her clever teenage parenting tactics.

After imposing an unusual consequence to combat her son’s recent attitude, the mother hopes her son has gained a little insight into the world around him.

Cierra Forney has a crucial, important job with lifelong implications: parenting her 13-year-old son. From her recent social media post, Forney understands her power as a mother to mold her son into a respectful, responsible man.

Forney explained that her 13-year-old had been acting “entitled” as of late. She explained he was “acting like he’s too good to shop at Wal-Mart or making snarky comments about kids at school who shop at the goodwill and quite a few other things,” Forney explained.

So Forney came up with a little life lesson for her son. She drove him to the local Goodwill with $20 dollars of his own money in hand.

goodwill

His task was to pick out a week’s worth of clothing to wear to school. “Whatever he found is what he would have to wear,” Forney explained.

From the looks of her sullen teenager dragging a few clothing items down the aisle, he was feeling all kinds of emotions about shopping at Goodwill.

Forney knows her son hated shopping there, but she cares more about his character than his comfort.

“He isn’t happy and shed a few tears,” Forney wrote. “But I firmly believe in 15 years he will look back and laugh at the day his Mom made him shop at goodwill.”

Forney hopes the Goodwill experience helped her son understand that money and image aren’t everything.

Judging others by how they look, which is nearly impossible for teenagers to avoid, is not okay in the Forney household.

“[If] you have to degrade other people because of where they shop, then you too will shop there,” Forney stated. She added that personally, she loves the Goodwill company.

Recognizing her parental decision may be controversial, Forney asked critics to keep their rude comments to themselves. “I’m trying to raise good, respectful humans,” she concluded.

Many have shared Forney’s post on social media, wildly supporting her decision. “You cannot put a price tag on integrity and respect. Good job Mom,” one viewer wrote.

Breaking: Hillary Clinton To Face Legal Consequences For Dossier

Hillary Clinton to face legal consequences

Hillary Clinton thought she was finally out of the woods when it came to being charged over her anti-Donald Trump dossier. Unfortunately for her, however, she just learned that she was dead wrong.

Daily Mail reported that House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes spoke out on Monday night to say that it was Clinton’s campaign that was the real Russian collaborator and that it used the FBI as a weapon against Trump during the election.

While talking to Fox News host Sean Hannity on Monday night, Nunes accused the Democrats of being hypocrites, saying that there was a “clear link” between them and Russia during the election.

“I think there’s clear, there’s clear evidence of collusion that the Democratic Party and the Hillary Clinton campaign colluded with the Russians,” he said.

Nunes then slammed Democrats for criticizing a memo compiled by his office alleging the Justice Department and the FBI abused a government surveillance program against a Trump campaign adviser.

“We have a clear link to Russia – you have a campaign who hired a law firm, who hire Fusion GPS, who hired a foreign agent, who then got information from the Russians on the other campaign,” the Republican chairman said.

“It seems like the counterintelligence investigation should have been opened up against the Hillary campaign when they got ahold of the dossier. But that didn’t happen, either.”

Nunes went on to say that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court that granted the warrant against Trump aide Carter Page wasn’t informed of the political origins of the funding behind the dossier.

This comes days after the release of the four-page House Intelligence memo, which contends that the FBI, when it applied for a surveillance warrant on Page, relied excessively on ex-British spy Christopher Steele whose opposition research was funded by Democrats.

Michael Buble Confirms Wife Is Pregnant With Baby Number Three, Then Gender Released

buble-family

Rumors surrounding a potential addition to the Buble family began circulating early this year.

In late 2016, singer Michael Buble, 42, and his wife, actress Luisana Lopilato, 30, were devastated by their young son Noah’s diagnosis with liver cancer.

But thankfully, by Feb. 2018, little Noah had undergone chemotherapy and was reportedly “on the mend.”

“Thank God, my son is well,” Lopilato said last April. “My son’s recovery is a long process as you all know and he has to continue with check-ups … But we are very happy.”

With such wonderful news, fans couldn’t help but wonder if the family was looking to begin a new chapter of their lives with another child.

Many felt it was obvious that Noah, now 4, and his younger brother Elias, 2, were about to become big brothers.

And they were right. Buble took the stage to speak at the Juno Awards in Vancouver this weekend, where he revealed that he and Lopilato are expecting a baby.

He began his speech by telling the audience about the birth of their first child five years ago before revealing the news.

“Oops, you did it again — My wife and I are pregnant with our No. 3,” he said, smiling while he blew a kiss out into the audience to his wife. “I love you so much, mi amor.”

The family has also revealed the gender of the baby to close friends and family, and reports say it will be a girl.

Just before the announcement, Lopalito also hinted at the idea that they would be welcoming another baby into the family.

“I would love to have another child because being a mother is the best role,” she said. “I would love to have 20 children but my body wouldn’t be up to it.”

It’s clear the couple can’t wait for their first baby girl to arrive, and we know she will be very loved.

“We are a little weird about our kids. We love to be with our kids a lot. When we are out for one hour, we miss them!” Lopalito said.

Congratulations to the Buble family! We can’t wait to see your beautiful baby girl.

After Years Of Remaining Silent, Dennis Quaid Finally Admits What We’ve All Been Suspecting

dennis-quaid-balloon

We know Dennis Quaid for his captivating on-screen roles in movies like The RookieAny Given SundayThe Parent Trap, and Legion.

Now Dennis is back for another dramatic part, but this time, his character is an abusive father who finds redemption through the grace of God.

While Dennis is used to falling deep into his characters, he never thought that this role would reunite him with his faith…

quaid
Flickr/Gordon Correll

Before Dennis was a superstar living in Hollywood, he was a Texas boy with big dreams.

He was born to Juanita and William Rudy Quaid, a real estate agent and electrician respectively on April 9, 1954.

The Houston-based family was devout Baptists, and growing up in a religious household was something Dennis loved.

He spoke on camera about his decision to live a devout life:

“I grew up in a Baptist church, went to Sunday school, and then I got baptized when I was nine and made the decision the same day as my brother. My brother and I, Randy, were both baptized on the same day.”

After doing decently in high school, Dennis was accepted into the University of Houston.

However, Dennis quickly realized the collegiate life wasn't for him – he dropped out before graduating and moved to Hollywood to pursue a career in acting.

The thought of making it big in the industry was a long shot, but he knew he had to give it a try!

young dennis quaid
Wikimedia Commons

Months after moving to Hollywood, Dennis was still struggling to find steady work as an actor. Thankfully, his big break happened when he got a role in the movie Breaking Away.

Shortly after earning critic praise for that performance, he landed another big gig as an astronaut named Gordon Cooper in The Right Stuff.

From there, Dennis' career took off and he was landing impressive movie and television shows roles right and left.

Unfortunately, the dark of Hollywood enveloped Dennis. He later revealed that he battled anorexia and drug addiction after gaining fame. It was clear God and faith weren't as important to Dennis once he became a celebrity.

stanislaus county fair
Facebook/Stanislaus County Fair

Fortunately, Dennis realized his lifestyle was extraordinarily unhealthy and decided to get help for both problems. He gained back the 40 pounds he lost to anorexia and vowed never to use drugs again.

Despite his mental well-being, his relationship with God was still on the backburner. It wasn't until he had the opportunity to travel the globe in his late 20s when he finally started to reconnect and ask the important questions.

“The question I had as I went around the world was ‘Who is God?' I became a seeker really… I read the Bible cover to cover. For me, it's Jesus… it's the red words of Jesus. How simple it is. There really is redemption and that was the inspiration.”

It was during that trip when Dennis wrote “On My Way to Heaven” for his mother. She was the one who supported him through thick and thin, and showed him how to revel in the love of God.

Unfortunately, Dennis never could figure out the appropriate bridge for the song. It went unfinished for 25 long years until he landed the role in I Can Only Imagine.

He said:

“What moved me about finishing it really was my character of Arthur and how he found grace. That's the beautiful thing about the good news that Jesus was talking about.”

Dennis' faith in God was renewed and he was able to complete the song just in time for his mother's 91st birthday. We know that she loved the song and we wish him nothing but the best in the years to come.

No matter how long you stray away from your faith, God is always there to guide the way back to His love.

dennis quiad
YouTube/I Can Only Imagine

Learn more about Dennis' faith in the video below:

Airline Refuses To Let Dad And Newborn On Flight. Elderly Nurse Says ‘You’re Coming Home With Me’

dad-newborn-and-nurse

It's easy to see why this heartwarming story is going viral.

A man named Rubin Swift recently traveled from his hometown in Cleveland, Ohio to Phoenix, Arizona — and he had done so for the most exciting reason imaginable.

Rubin went to Arizona to pick up his newborn daughter, Ru-Andria. He had been granted custody of Ru-Andria and couldn't wait to take her back to Ohio with him.

frontier airport

After leaving the hospital, Rubin and his four-day-old daughter checked in at Sky Harbor International Airport. He made sure to bring a note from the doctor stating Ru-Andria was cleared to fly.

However, the ticket agent at the airport said they couldn't board the plane; their policy bans babies under seven days old from flying.

In an unfamiliar part of the country and with no friends or family to come to his rescue, Rubin was left in a complete state of panic. He and his newborn were about to be stranded for three whole days until Ru-Andria was one-week-old!

nurse savior

But then Rubin remembered an elderly woman he had met at the hospital on the day Ru-Andria was born. Joy Ringhofer, a volunteer at Banner University Medical Center, cradled Ru-Andria in the minutes after her birth.

When Rubin walked into the delivery room and saw Joy holding his baby girl, the pair of strangers made an instant yet brief connection.

Back at the airport, something told Rubin to take a chance and give Joy a call, even though they had barely spoken to one another. He called Joy and explained his dire situation.

“I'm coming to get you and take you home,” she said without hesitation. Rubin was confused – at first, he thought she planned to drive him and his baby all the way back to Ohio.

But once Joy pulled up and they started driving down the highway, Rubin realized they were going back to Joy's house. What followed was three days of kindness and selflessness that will restore your faith in humanity…

It’s Happening, Skeletons Are Beginning To Come Out Of Mueller’s Closet

Special Counsel Robert Mueller

Examine the past and some of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s skeletons are coming out of the closet.

The Special Counsel is not as pure as the driven snow as some would have you believe. In fact, Mr. Mueller has less than a stellar record of performance.

If you can go back to the 1980s you will find that he was guilty of wrongful prosecution and conviction of some innocent men.

Here are some of the skeletons that are dancing in the limelight now.

As Written and Reported By Nick Givas for the Daily Caller:

Fox News host Sean Hannity devoted time on his Tuesday show to examining the past of special counsel Robert Mueller and his findings were intriguing.

Hannity referred to a report from Fox News’ Sarah Carter citing Mueller’s career as a prosecutor in the 1980s.

When Mueller was serving as assistant U.S. attorney, four men were wrongfully convicted and imprisoned for a crime they did not commit and the special counsel was in charge of the case when it happened.

“Robert Mueller’s career has been anything but impeccable,” Hannity said. “One of the worst stains on his record comes from his time Boston, where he served as assistant U.S. attorney and acting U.S. attorney in the ’80s. During this time notorious Boston mob boss Whitey Bulger, he was actively engaged by the FBI as an informant. The relationship between Bulger and the bureau was wrought with nothing but corruption and criminal collusion.”

“Bulger’s FBI handler, guy by the name of John Connolly covered up for many of the horrific crimes that were committed by Bulger and his associates, including one instance where four men were wrongfully framed and convicted and imprisoned for decades — all for a murder it turns out they did not commit,” Hannity continued. “The men were ultimately exonerated. A judge awarded $101 million in damages, but not before two of the men actually ….

Sarah Huckabee Sanders Makes CNN’s Jim Acosta Look Like A Total Fool

Sarah Huckabee Sanders and CNN’s Jim Acosta

Sarah Huckabee Sanders is no pushover. CNN pundit Jim Acosta tried to bully her into paying attention to him during a White House press briefing. She quickly put him in his place.

“Sarah, this is the third press briefing you have not taken a question from CNN,” Acosta yelled Monday. “Do you expect the Justice Department to enforce all subpoenas, Sarah?”

He carried his wounded feelings home with him and complained on Twitter.

Sanders responded immediately.

“Courage is combat veterans Sgt. Peck and Staff Sgt. Dwyer — the two heroes at the briefing. #itsnotaboutyou,” she tweeted.

It’s not the first time that Sanders has brought Acosta down a peg. She also tore into the fake news host at the end of last year.

“When journalists make honest mistakes, they should own up to them. Sometimes, and a lot of times, you don’t,” Sanders sniped at him.

“I’m sorry, I’m not finished… There is a very big difference between making honest mistakes and purposefully misleading the American people… you cannot say it’s an honest mistake when you’re purposely putting out information you know is false.”

Acosta barely slowed down after Sanders outed him as a phony.

Millennials don’t seem to mind fake news as long as it’s “woke.” President Trump himself once threw Acosta out of a press briefing, and instead of tanking his reputation, the incident buoyed him.

CNN viewers love him precisely because he’s more of an entertainer than a traditional journalist.

“Jim, I’m gonna say once and for all that I’m moving on,” Sanders said last December. “I’m not taking another question from you.”

CNN is going to continue sending Acosta to the White House because it’s good for ratings. Will Sanders start taking questions from him again?

She’s not interested in playing games but she also knows that he’s looking for something that he can twist into being sensational rather than the truth.

Neil Gorsuch Scores Supreme Victory Against Abortion… Liberals Stunned

Neil Gorsuch scores supreme victory

California is probably the abortion capital of the nation and until the Supreme Court stepped in, certain medical establishments were allowed to aggressively advertise abortion. It’s disgusting, wrong and immoral.

Luckily that’s all gonna change now…

DailyWire reports:

On Tuesday, the justices of the Supreme Court sounded as if they are ready to shred the California law that requires pregnancy centers to notify women that the state offers subsidies for abortion.

That law was adopted in California in 2015, and forced the pregnancy centers to post a prominent notice if they had “no licensed medical provider” available.

If the centers were licensed, they were forced to notify clients that the state offers “free or low-cost” contraception, prenatal care and abortion.

As The Los Angeles Times reports of the case, titled NIFLA vs. Becerra, the justices gave the California law short shrift:

Justice Elena Kagan, referring to the fact that doctors and for-profit clinics were exempt from the law, said, “If it has been gerrymandered, that’s a serious issue.” Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. echoed that the law “has a lot of crazy exceptions. … What you’re left with is a very strange pattern, and, gee, it turns out just about the only clinics that are covered by this are pro-life clinics.”

Justice Anthony M. Kennedy saw the law as violating the laws of free speech, calling the required notice “mandating speech” that “alters the content of the message.”

Justice Neil M. Gorsuch said that California has “other means to provide messages. … It’s pretty unusual to force a private speaker to do that for you under the 1st Amendment.”

After Michael P. Farris, a lawyer for the centers, said advertisements, including billboards, would have to offer the information in large print and in 13 languages, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg turned to the lawyer for California and stated, “If you have to say that, those two sentences in 13 different languages, it can be very burdensome,” she said.

The Times reported further:

“What would happen if an unlicensed center just had a billboard that said, ‘Choose Life.’ Would they have to make the disclosure?” Kennedy asked.

“Yes, your honor,” Farris replied.

“It would be 29 words, in the same size font as ‘Choose Life’?” Kennedy continued.

Yes, Farris said, “and in the number of languages required by that county.”

Kennedy said he had heard all he needed to hear. “It seems to me that means that this is an undue burden. And that should suffice to invalidate the statute,” he said.

As Politico reported, “California Deputy Solicitor General Joshua Klein acknowledged that the law might be unconstitutional in some applications, but he encouraged the justices to return the issue to the lower courts to address specific concerns involving certain plaintiffs. That did not sit well with Kennedy. “You want me to have a remand to have them tell the court what a billboard is?” Kennedy scoffed.

Only Justice Stephen G. Breyer defended the law.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor also agreed with those who found the law problematic.

The Times concluded, “By the hour’s end, it appeared the justices would vote to strike down all or at least most of the law’s mandatory disclosure provisions.”

John Bolton Just Put The FEAR Into Deep State, Anti-Trump Operatives

National Security Adviser John Bolton

John Bolton, who’s a former ambassador and a popular Fox News contributor is now President Trump’s National Security Adviser.

This move was more than welcomed by conservatives as they know Bolton is a smart, no-nonsense “get ‘er done” type who won’t hesitate to make bold moves.

His first mission is to clean house at the National Security Council. There’s gonna be a lot of job openings there very shortly…

Daily Caller reports:

President Donald Trump’s newly appointed national security adviser, John Bolton, reportedly plans to “clean house” at the National Security Council.

Sources told Foreign Policy that Bolton’s planned purge will start with Obama administration holdovers and eventually broaden to include leakers and those disloyal to the president.

“Bolton can and will clean house,” a former White House official told Foreign Policy.

Another official issued a warning to former Obama officials — “Everyone who was there during Obama years should start packing their shit.”

But the purge reportedly won’t stop with former Obama appointees. A source told Foreign Policy that Bolton intends to “remove almost all the political [appointees] McMaster brought in.”

One Bolton source put a damper on the report, saying it was “premature” to talk about staff changes.

Another cautioned that any staff changes, were they to be signed off on by Bolton, would be slow in coming because of the time it takes to process security clearances, which will likely leave Bolton with most current staff for President Trump’s upcoming May meeting with North Korea’s Kim Jong Un.

However, Matthew Freedman, a Republican consultant and Bolton adviser who is helping to manage the transition, is reportedly “overly ambitious about cleaning house,” according to a Republican source, although Freedman himself told Foreign Policy there was currently “no list” of people to fire.

Judicial Watch Files New Lawsuit Against Hillary Clinton’s ‘Pay-For-Play’

new lawsuit against Hillary Clinton

Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s “pay-for-play” scandal, according to Gateway Pundit.

The conservative watchdog group said it became aware that Clinton made a previously unknown $48 million on her husband’s speeches to foreign entities while she led the State Department.

On Wednesday, Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said the lawsuit pertains to records regarding Dennis Cheng, who served as Clinton’s Deputy Chief of Protocol at the State Department for two years.

When Cheng left the State Department in 2011, he began working for the Clinton Foundation.

In April 2015, he was named as the finance director of the Hillary for America presidential campaign.

When she led the State Department, Clinton used her foundation to accept massive donations in exchange for approving favorable policy toward foreign governments.

Cheng reportedly raised $246 million between July 2011 and February 2015 while he was at the Clinton Foundation.

Previous Judicial Watch lawsuits filed under the Freedom of Information Act revealed cases in which the Clintons raked in tens of millions of dollars while selling off American influence to foreign nations.

Fitton said he’s confident the new lawsuit will further prove how corrupt Clinton was and illuminate how she likely broke the law at the Department of State.

“Judicial Watch proved the Clinton State Department became a corrupt arm of the Clinton Foundation. The Justice and State Departments seem to be still protecting Hillary Clinton,” Fitton said.

He added: “Judicial Watch is stepping into the gap and, though this and other ongoing FOIA lawsuits, aims to expose and hold the Clinton cash machine accountable to the rule of law.”

As usual, Judicial Watch continues to do the heavy lifting to hold the Clintons accountable for lining their own pockets while selling off American influence.

It was Fitton’s group who exposed Clinton’s private server, her negligence in Benghazi, and how she deleted tens of thousands of emails.

With a strong track record like that, Judicial Watch’s lawsuit could bust the “pay-for-play” scandal wide open.

Recent Posts